Why is it important to use technology for your course?
Approximately 4000 students take introductory psychology
courses each year at the University of Alberta. Most of our
sections are large (up to 495 students) and consist of a lecture,
text to read, and multiple choice examinations. Students learn
a lot of psychology content but they don't delve deeply into
any area covered in the course. Many students also don't develop
a sense of belonging in such large classes. Our department
simply does not have the staffing resources to offer small
classes or tutorials in which students can be guided in developing
critical thinking, reading, and communication skills. We also
don't have the resources to provide active learning experiences
in laboratory settings. On the other hand, there is a wealth
of psychology resources on the Web and there is excellent
discussion software available for communication. Technology
can alleviate some of the constraints and help students learn
better.
What was the instructional goal for the intro.psych web
site?
The goals of intro.psych are to (a) allow students the opportunity
to explore some introductory psychology topics in greater
depth, (b) help students begin developing critical thinking,
reading, and communication skills, (c) help students become
more computer literate, and (d) provide a sense of a learning
community to which the students belong in the classroom.
How do students benefit from intro.psych you designed
and implemented?
Some students like the intro.psych and some do not. We are
conducting a large-scale evaluation but I can say there is
anecdotal evidence indicating that those who like the technological
interventions seem more likely to continue their study in
psychology. All students benefit from this alternative form
of instruction in terms of their grades. They also develop
better thinking, reading and writing skills. They become more
critical towards the psychology information they find on the
Web.
What are the challenges you encounter when applying technology
in your teaching?
Some students are resistant to this alternative form of instruction.
It was painful to receive some negative feedback but I have
learned to be very clear that intro.psych is an alternative
and to advise students that they should consider the benefits
of both intro.psych and the traditional lecture format. They
should select the format that is appropriate for their needs.
Even among those who prefer the alternative format, I am challenged
to help students realize that they need to develop personal
control for their learning and that they need to be active
learners. I cannot provide students with the knowledge and
skill they need to succeed - the students must actively engage
in their own learning experiences. Having to constantly defend
this alternative and to help other faculty accept that students
can benefit from technology are also large challenges.
As an instructor and researcher, do you find this experience
rewarding?
Yes. As an instructor, I am thrilled to help students become
critically reflective, self-motivated, active learners. These
warm, fuzzy feelings are an important motivator as an instructor.
I find I am closer to my students. The students also experience
a greater sense of belonging in the classroom. As a researcher,
I have the opportunity to develop instruction based on learning
and instructional theory and to evaluate the effects of this
alternative to traditional lecture-based instruction on student
affect, learning, and progress through their undergraduate
program.
back to top
|