Subaltern Voices Series
Speaking & Theorizing from the Disciplinary Margins
Subaltern Voices Series
Speaking & Theorizing from the Disciplinary Margins
Dr. Falguni A. Sheth (Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Political Theory,
Hampshire College, Amherst)
Topic: “The Violence of Law: Race, Culture and Exclusion.”
Date: Thursday, 29 March 2007
Co-sponsored by the Centre for Constitutional Studies and the Peace and Postconflict
Studies Program.
Abstract: In the five years since September 11, 2001, Muslim men and women have
been subjected to remarkably cruel treatment in the name of stopping or preventing
terrorist activity. What are their transgressions which engender such treatment? I suggest
that one of the Western world’s more urgent concerns is the danger of radical cultural
heterogeneity or the threat to the safety of cultural homogeneity. The treatment to which
Muslims have been subjected reflects a fundamental hostility that sovereign institutions
direct towards individuals whose comportment seems to threaten the fundamental
political-cultural order on which the state is based. This hostility is a response to ‘unruly’
signs or practices that conspicuously violate a dominant ‘neutral’ cultural or political
norm, such as public secularism. These signs also serve as proxies for other more elusive
threats to a cultural-political regime, in this case, Western liberalism. In this paper, I will
refer to the ‘problem of Muslim culture,’ although this analysis can be extended to a
range of ‘minorities’ and minority cultures in relation to a dominant culture. Such
persecution and ostracization has been described as exceptions or aberrations of ‘fair and
just social institutions.’ But these events are neither aberrations nor mistakes. Rather,
they are manifestations of the form that justice takes, when we understand this term to be
not about fairness, but power, division, and violence. Whether overt instances of physical
or psychic harm, or more subtle cases of imprisonment or privation of rights or
procedures, these events are a manifestation of another fundamental violence that
permeates our legal structure. It is a metaphysical violence, existing alongside the vivid,
almost ordinary, violence that we have become accustomed to considering. Philosophers
such as Giorgio Agamben and Walter Benjamin have argued that this violence is the
essence of law. My analysis supports this reading, although I argue that this violence is
not random, as has been suggested, but rather directed towards always and already
vulnerable populations.
Bio: Falguni A. Sheth, Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Political Theory at
Hampshire College in Amherst. She received her B.A. in Rhetoric from UC Berkeley,
and her MA and Ph.D. in Philosophy at the New School for Social Research. She writes
and teaches in the areas of continental and political philosophy, philosophy of race, and
legal and feminist theory. She has published articles on Heidegger, Foucault and race as a
technology of juridical and political institutions; racial and intra-racial dynamics in the
U.S. political imaginary; the tendency of liberal polities to locate ‘exceptions’ to its ethos
of universalism and equal rights; the feminism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and ethics of
various public policy issues. She is co-editor of a book, Race, Liberalism, and Economics
(U of Michigan Press 2004), for which she has written an essay on the philosophical
underpinnings of John Stuart Mill's disagreement with Thomas Carlyle on race, slavery, and free markets. She has been awarded a Woodrow Wilson 2006 Career Enhancement Fellowship for Junior Faculty, to complete her book, provisionally entitled, The Political
Theory of Race: Technologies and Logics of Exclusion (forthcoming SUNY). There she
draws upon the recent situation of Muslims and Arabs, the caste system, the practice of
veiling, and the framework of liberalism, and other examples, to illustrate how racial
divisions are a fundamental feature of sovereign-subject relations in a polity.